In a 2014 report that office said the state’s Department of Environmental Protection “monitors shale waste with self-reported data that is neither verified nor quality controlled for accuracy and reliability.” State oversight of fracking wastewater from 2009 to 2012 came under criticism from the Pennsylvania Auditor General. That’s months before Latkanich said he took his photos. Chevron denies that, saying it removed the wastewater and the liner in the summer of 2012. Latkanich said he took the photos December 15 or 16, 2012. Latkanich brought out photos that he said show a crumpled liner on the edge of a pit still full of water. Latkanich thinks fracking chemicals that were shot down the gas well and came back up were stored in a pit on his property that wasn’t lined - as it was supposed to be - to prevent leaking. Something is wrong with Ryan! And he came out with rashes that were beyond poison ivy or oak.” Four years ago, when his son, Ryan, 7, was in the bathtub, Latkanich said, “His mother screams upstairs like bloody murder. ![]() Latkanich thinks fracking chemicals polluted his water well and made his family sick. Chevron then acquired those rights in 2011. Pretty much since the fracking boom began, people who live near these wells have worried about chemicals getting into their water and making them sick.Ī new set of documents shared with Marketplace by the Partnership for Policy Integrity from the Environmental Protection Agency shows that the agency has previously undisclosed health concerns that some fracking chemicals might cause things like liver poisoning and tumors.īryan Latkanich makes his home in the rural hills of Pennsylvania, smack in the middle of the largest natural gas region of the country known as the Marcellus Shale. Latkanich sold the rights to drill on his property in 2010. It relies on shooting high-pressure water mixed with chemicals down into layers of rock to crack the stone and release oil and gas. Please do not discuss the concept of the autotldr bot here.We’re about a decade into an oil and gas revolution known shorthand as fracking. NOTICE: This thread is for discussing the submission topic. Summary Source | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: chemical #1 PFAS #2 E.P.A. commerce, and this line of defense is struggling to maintain its integrity," the whistle-blowers said in their disclosure, which was released by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, a Maryland-based nonprofit group. scientists evaluating new chemicals "Are the last line of defense between harmful - even deadly - chemicals and their introduction into U.S. office in charge of reviewing toxic chemicals tampered with the assessments of dozens of chemicals to make them appear safer.Į.P.A. In recent days, whistle-blowers have alleged in the Intercept that the E.P.A. ![]() The Toxic Substances Control Act grandfathered in thousands of chemicals already in commercial use, including many PFAS chemicals. The E.P.A.'s assessment was carried out under the 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act, which authorizes the agency to review and regulate new chemicals before they are manufactured or distributed. Still, he said it was clear "That the approved polymer, if and when it breaks down in the environment, will break down into PFAS.". Schug, a professor of analytical Chemistry at the University of Texas at Arlington, said the chemicals identified in the FracFocus database fell into the PFAS group of compounds, although he added that there was not enough information to make a direct link between the chemicals in the database to the ones approved by the E.P.A. ![]() (I'm a bot)Ī class of man-made chemicals that are toxic even in minuscule concentrations, for decades PFAS were used to make products like nonstick pans, stain-resistant carpeting and firefighting foam. This is the best tl dr I could make, original reduced by 49%.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |